Deontological vs utilitarian on affimative action for women and minorities

Select network Affirmative action policy can be a highly charged issue in contemporary society.

Deontological vs utilitarian on affimative action for women and minorities

Full Answer Advocates of utilitarianism believe that all actions must seek to produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

This applies even if an act harms an innocent person. For example, if a surgeon has the chance to save three lives by harvesting the organs of a healthy person, utilitarian theory suggests that harming the healthy person is acceptable to save a greater number of lives.

The Morale Basis for Affirmative Actions Arman Kanooni OM, Section 1, Ethics and Social Responsibility programs to overcome the historical effects of discrimination against women and minorities. Affirmative action refers to a set of specific procedures designed to ensure an equal distribution equality and the principle of. Utilitarian principle, affirmative action, discrimination. Add Remove. Homework help from our online tutors - urbanagricultureinitiative.com Affirmative Action:Utilitarian & Deontological Views action could be justified on utilitarian grounds. Deontological Ethics There are two major ethics theories that attempt to specify and justify moral rules and principles: utilitarianism and deontological ethics. Utilitarianism (also called consequentialism) is a moral theory developed and refined in the modern world in the writings of Jeremy Bentham () and John Stuart Mill ().

By contrast, deontology focuses on the moral aspects of any action, not its consequences. This philosophy believes that some acts are always wrong, regardless of the consequences. Deontologists find lying to be unacceptable, for example, even when someone lies in order to bring about a desirable result.

Both of these systems have weaknesses.

For instance, critics charge that utilitarianism justifies enslaving a small group of people in order to help a larger group. Critics of deontology point out that its rigidity does not allow for exceptional cases where a morally dubious action avoids causing harm to others.The Morale Basis for Affirmative Actions Arman Kanooni OM, Section 1, Ethics and Social Responsibility programs to overcome the historical effects of discrimination against women and minorities.

Affirmative action refers to a set of specific procedures designed to ensure an equal distribution equality and the principle of. Affirmative action programs have played a critical role in opening up opportunities for women and minorities to begin to take their rightful place in our society.

Deontological vs utilitarian on affimative action for women and minorities

But equal opportunity for women is still a long way off. The best short definition of affirmative action is one that focuses on its aim: "to contribute to the demise of occupational segregation by reducing the racist or sexist impact which bias-free practices have on women and minorities." (Ezorsky, p.

). The best short definition of affirmative action is one that focuses on its aim: "to contribute to the demise of occupational segregation by reducing the racist or sexist impact which bias-free practices have on women and minorities." (Ezorsky, p.

Discrimination and Affirmative Action

). The primary difference between deontology and utilitarianism, two competing systems of ethics, is that the former system is concerned with whether an act is intrinsically right or wrong, while the latter system believes that only the consequences of .

"Deontological Vs Utilitarian On Affimative Action For Women And Minorities" Essays and Research Deontological Vs Utilitarian On Affimative Action For Women And Minorities.

The Advancement of Women and Minorities in the Workplace HR Senior Seminar in Human Resources Development Park University Within any .

L03 Deontology vs Utilitarianism, The eternal battleā€¦ | PSY Ethics and Leadership (Buban)