Thus, the motive of the person who commits an act of euthanasia is to benefit the one whose death is brought about.
In particular, these include situations where a person kills another, painlessly, but for no reason beyond that of personal gain; or accidental deaths that are quick and painless, but not intentional. A kills another person B for the benefit of the second person, who actually does benefit from being killed".
Based on this, she offered a definition incorporating those elements, stating that euthanasia "must be defined as death that results from the intention of one person to kill another person, using the most gentle and painless means possible, that is motivated solely by the best interests of the person who dies.
Their definition specifically discounts fetuses to distinguish between abortions and euthanasia: In response, Wreen argued that euthanasia has to be voluntary, and that "involuntary euthanasia is, as such, a great wrong". Hence, euthanasia can be voluntary only. In the definitions offered by Beauchamp and Davidson and, later, by Wreen, consent on the part of the patient was not considered as one of their criteria, although it may have been required to justify euthanasia.
Voluntary euthanasia See also: Right to die Voluntary euthanasia is conducted with the consent of the patient. Active voluntary euthanasia A discussion on the morality of euthanasia legal in Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.
Passive voluntary euthanasia is legal throughout the US per Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. When the patient brings about his or her own death with the assistance of a physician, the term assisted suicide is often used instead.
Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and the U. Non-voluntary euthanasia Non-voluntary euthanasia is conducted when the consent of the patient is unavailable. Examples include child euthanasiawhich is illegal worldwide but decriminalised under certain specific circumstances in the Netherlands under the Groningen Protocol.
Involuntary euthanasia Involuntary euthanasia is conducted against the will of the patient. Passive and active euthanasia Voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary types can be further divided into passive or active variants.
While some authors consider these terms to be misleading and unhelpful, they are nonetheless commonly used. In some cases, such as the administration of increasingly necessary, but toxic doses of painkillersthere is a debate whether or not to regard the practice as active or passive.
In his work, Euthanasia medica, he chose this ancient Greek word and, in doing so, distinguished between euthanasia interior, the preparation of the soul for death, and euthanasia exterior, which was intended to make the end of life easier and painless, in exceptional circumstances by shortening life.
That the ancient meaning of an easy death came to the fore again in the early modern period can be seen from its definition in the 18th century Zedlers Universallexikon: According to Marx, a doctor had a moral duty to ease the suffering of death through encouragement, support and mitigation using medication.
Such an "alleviation of death" reflected the contemporary zeitgeistbut was brought into the medical canon of responsibility for the first time by Marx.
Marx also stressed the distinction between the theological care of the soul of sick people from the physical care and medical treatment by doctors.
Thomas Aquinas opposed both and argued that the practice of euthanasia contradicted our natural human instincts of survival,  as did Francois Ranchin —a French physician and professor of medicine, and Michael Boudewijns —a physician and teacher.
|The first apparent usage of the term "euthanasia" belongs to the historian Suetoniuswho described how the Emperor Augustus"dying quickly and without suffering in the arms of his wife, Livia, experienced the 'euthanasia' he had wished for. In particular, these include situations where a person kills another, painlessly, but for no reason beyond that of personal gain; or accidental deaths that are quick and painless, but not intentional.|
|Ethical Key Issues - Euthanasia A Duty to Die With rising healthcare costs, and an aging population, if euthanasia or assisted suicide is legalised, disability activists fear that voluntary euthanasia will soon give way to involuntary or coerced euthanasia.|
|In certain situations, passive euthanasia "letting die" is morally permissible.|
Questel described various customs which were employed at the time to hasten the death of the dying, including the sudden removal of a pillow, which was believed to accelerate deathand argued against their use, as doing so was "against the laws of God and Nature".
A similar use of chloroform was revealed by Joseph Bullar in However, in neither case was it recommended that the use should be to hasten death. In Samuel Williams, a schoolteacher, initiated the contemporary euthanasia debate through a speech given at the Birmingham Speculative Club in England, which was subsequently published in a one-off publication entitled Essays of the Birmingham Speculative Club, the collected works of a number of members of an amateur philosophical society.
That in all cases of hopeless and painful illness, it should be the recognized duty of the medical attendant, whenever so desired by the patient, to administer chloroform or such other anaesthetic as may by-and-bye supersede chloroform — so as to destroy consciousness at once, and put the sufferer to a quick and painless death; all needful precautions being adopted to prevent any possible abuse of such duty; and means being taken to establish, beyond the possibility of doubt or question, that the remedy was applied at the express wish of the patient.Euthanasia and assisted suicide are foundational issues because they attack a foundational right, the right to life.
These issues, therefore, carry greater weight than issues which deal with the quality of life or with lesser rights. Therefore, in many cases where it is right to let a patient die, it is also right to practice active euthanasia.
WARNING: Notice that Rachels does not defend active euthanasia (killing), because he never defends the morality of passive euthanasia.
His goal is to challenge the distinction. After reading “The Morality of Euthanasia” by james Rachels, respond to the following questions concerning the distinction between active and passive euthanasia located at the end of the chapter.
PDF | On, KLEMENS KAPPEL and others published The Morality of Euthanasia discussion of ways in which the moderate might try to.
explain why he will not accept active euthanasia. One. The Rev. Tadeusz Pacholczyk spoke about Death on Demand - the morality of euthanasia at the Eden Resort Inn in Manheim Township Wednesday evening, October 24, Suppose that the moral case for legalizing voluntary euthanasia does come to be judged as stronger than the case against legalization and voluntary euthanasia is made legally permissible in more jurisdictions than at present.